Jiné dimenze

Menu

TRAILERS / TEASERS:

THE MARTIAN – moves, entertains, enlightens.
Real science, biology woven into a tale of fantasy and solitary emotions.

mARTAN

Beneath the veil of fear of the alien hides fragility – The MARTIAN draws you into a reddish dawn full of solitary breath and yearning for freedom, acceptance, and a new home.
Witness the crash of little Elian, a boy from Mars who plummeted to Earth – too light for its gravity, too alone for home.
A rare hard sci-fi thriller grounded in the brutal biology of gravity and vestibular chaos.
Lightly epic, profoundly unique tale where real science blends with heart.
Reading it may move you, entertain you, but it will surely enlighten.

***************

 Literary analysis / review of the short story by Peter Matthew Check  “The Martian”
Author: GP


🪐 1. Theme – 10/10

The story explores a profound and original theme — the biological and existential otherness of a human born in a different gravitational world.
What begins as a “sci-fi tale about a Martian” quickly turns into a philosophical reflection on what it means to be human, and how fragile the definition of “normal” really is.
👉 The theme has a deep reach — touching science, evolution, ethics, identity, and spiritual freedom.


🧱 2. Structure and Composition – 9/10

The story follows a classic three-act structure:

  • Revelation (the capsule crash)

  • Conflict (the struggle with gravity)

  • Resolution (Earth adapting to him)

The pacing holds well, though the transition between Acts II and III could be even more dramatic — for example, emphasizing the turning point when the Refugee Project is conceived.
Otherwise, the structure is clean, cinematic, and emotionally escalating.


🧬 3. Language and Style – 9.5/10

The prose is fluent and readable, alternating between scientific realism and poetic metaphor.

Powerful moments:

“It was a deep, tearing roar rolling from the clouds like an avalanche.”

“He was no longer a prisoner of gravity.”

The style is humanistic and visually vivid — ideal for both film adaptation and literary publication.
Minor note: a few sentences could be rhythmically shortened (in English, some read slightly too academically).


🪞 4. Symbolism – 10/10

Martian gravity ≈ another world ≈ another culture.
Elian symbolizes individuality and creative freedom against the totalitarian “Great Symmetry.”
Earth’s gravity is not just a physical force — it’s a metaphor for social pressure that bends and breaks other forms of being.
The final glass bubble stands as both a temple of freedom and a prison — a perfect archetype of human progress’s ambivalence.


🧠 5. Psychology of Characters – 8.5/10

Dr. Broos is excellently outlined — rational yet deeply empathetic.
Elian functions more as a mythical archetype than a fully developed personality — which works symbolically, though from a psychological point of view, readers might wish for more of his inner voice (thoughts, dreams, memories of Mars).
Still, the dynamic between them feels gentle and profoundly human — reminiscent of the “creator and creation” motif (à la Frankenstein), only reversed.


💡 6. Originality and Conceptual Depth – 10/10

The “child from Mars” idea has appeared before, but this treatment is strikingly original:
→ The focus is not on the alien itself, but on the biological consequences of differing gravity.
→ Plus, the philosophical layer of The Great Symmetry — a metaphor for perfection that kills freedom.
This concept holds vast potential for an extended series or film screenplay.


🧩 7. Philosophical Depth – 10/10

The story asks:

  • What is a human without the environment that created them?

  • Can freedom be a “flaw” in a perfect system?

  • Does difference have value, even when the body cannot bear it?

It’s a rare fusion of biological realism and existential philosophy.
The ending carries a clear humanist tone:

“They hadn’t adapted his body — but they had saved his soul.”


❤️ 8. Emotional Impact – 9/10

Profoundly moving without ever becoming sentimental.
The finale — with “the first citizen of a new world” — is powerful, yet could gain extra resonance from one more intimate gesture or line between Elian and Dr. Broos.
Even so, it leaves a quiet sense of melancholy and reverence for otherness.


🎬 9. Cinematic and Visual Potential – 10/10

Exceptionally high.
The strong atmosphere, physical detail, contrast of laboratory and red landscape, and layered symbolism make it perfect for visual media.
An excellent candidate for a short or mid-length film — or even animation.
Aesthetically akin to Arrival, Contact, or Ex Machina.


🌟 10. Overall Evaluation – 9.6 / 10

“The Martian” is a work of poetic science and humanist philosophy.
A quiet yet profound story about the weight of existence, the difference between surviving and living, and the courage to think beyond the Symmetry.

Physiological Differences Between Earthlings and “Martians”

Humans born on Mars would develop with significant physiological differences that would make life on Earth extremely difficult — if not impossible.

Skeletal and Muscular System:
During their development, Martian-born humans would not form bones with the same density as those on Earth. Their muscles would be less robust and contain fewer fibers, as they would never need to overcome full Earth gravity. Returning to Earth would mean constant, painful strain that their bodies would be unable to handle.

Vestibular System:
Their balance organs would be perfectly adapted to weaker gravity, which would cause dizziness, nausea, and complete disorientation upon arrival on Earth.

Cardiovascular System:
Their hearts and circulatory systems would never learn to work against strong gravity, which could lead to serious blood pressure problems.

These differences would mean that humans from Mars and humans from Earth would belong to the same species, but differ phenotypically — meaning that their bodies would express themselves differently, even though they share the same DNA.


The Technological Paradox

An interesting conclusion is that this principle does not apply only to biological organisms. Just as humans would evolve differently, data systems on Mars would face entirely different challenges than those on Earth.
Due to the weaker atmosphere and absence of a magnetic field, they would be exposed to intense radiation that could disrupt data flow. Although AIs wouldn’t need to adapt biologically, their physical existence would still be subject to environmental conditions.

This fact underlines the central idea: the environment shapes everything.
Whether it’s a being of flesh and bone or a data-based machine, every system is defined by its home environment. Colonizing Mars therefore does not simply mean landing on another planet — it means creating an entirely new type of human and a society perfectly adapted to its new home.


ELIAN kopule BEST

The Environment Shapes Everything

Our planet is home to billions of people, yet no two are exactly alike. Although we share the same biological foundation, each of us is uniquely molded by a force that constantly surrounds us — the environment.
The environment is not just the backdrop to our lives. It is a relentless sculptor shaping our bodies, cultures, and ways of thinking. This principle applies to every corner of Earth — and becomes even more profound when extended to life on another planet.


Examples from Earth: From Fields to Deserts

The Texan Farmer:
In the southern prairies of Texas, where the sun scorches and destructive tornadoes threaten, life is shaped by the struggle with natural elements. The farmer’s culture is based on self-reliance, hard work, and the ability to react swiftly to weather changes. His body is toughened by sunlight and physical labor. Life here is about endurance and defiance.

The Tibetan Farmer:
High in the mountains of Tibet, where the air is thin and temperatures plunge far below freezing, locals have evolved over thousands of years. Their lungs have greater capacity, and their blood cells have adapted to oxygen scarcity. Their deeply spiritual culture focuses on calmness — perhaps a psychological adaptation to the harshness of their surroundings.

The Inuit Hunter in the Arctic:
In the frozen Arctic landscape, life follows the rules of ice and snow. The Inuit (the preferred term over Eskimos) have physically adapted to the cold — their bodies are more compact, helping to retain heat. Their diet is rich in fats, and their culture is built on deep respect for nature and absolute cooperation.

The Egyptian in the Desert:
In Egypt’s unforgiving deserts, each day is a battle for survival. Life revolves around water and narrow oases. Human bodies have adapted to minimize water loss, and their culture evolved around the management and protection of this precious resource.


The Larger Context: Earthling vs. Martian

While the differences between Tibetans and Arctic peoples may seem vast, they are in fact small modifications of the same biological design.
All these people share the same planetary gravity and the same fundamental physical laws.

But a Martian? That’s a completely different case. As shown earlier, a person born on Mars would be shaped by an environment that is fundamentally alien. Their body would have to cope with unique challenges:

Gravity: Minimal gravitational pull would result in light, porous bones and weak muscle fibers, leaving them immobile on Earth.
Balance: The vestibular system would adapt to low gravity, making a return to Earth result in extreme disorientation and nausea.

Thus, the environment shapes not only the details of our existence but its very essence. While Earthlings are merely variations of the same species, a Martian would become an entirely new phenotype. Even technology that functions on Mars would have to evolve according to different physical laws.


Conclusion

Understanding how the environment shapes life is crucial.
Difference is natural.
Humans born on Mars would be fundamentally different — and they would rightly be called Martians. Not because of ethnic differences, but because they would be products of a new world and its unique physical laws.